transparency

Thursday, August 12th, 2004

Classic question and creative solution

Filed under: business,sewing — alison @ 23:45

I belong to various sewing lists and there’s a question that comes up regularly on them (as it tends to in life generally). It came up again today, in the following form:

To: “Fashion for the Plus size Woman” [______ @lyris.quiltropolis.com]
Subject: [fullfashion] Question regarding sewing for a friend

Hi all,

I have a question regarding sewing for friends and I was hoping you all might have some insight. I just completed a costume for a friend (the weird coat I was asking about a few months ago) and I’m not sure how to handle costs. I’m a sewing novice but I offered to make the costume to help my friend out. Now, the project is done, and he told me to total up my costs and “add in something for labor.” I was only expecting him to pay for materials, but it turned out to be a very time consuming project, so I appreciate that he’s willing to pay for my time. However, I have no idea what a reasonable amount is.

To complicate matters, we work together and see each other 8 hours a day, so I don’t want to strain our friendship/working relationship by haggling over money.

So, how do you handle the costs when sewing for friends?

Thanks,
Laura

This is usually a very slow list but for this question there was a flurry of eager answers. Lots of reminiscing about having been taken advantage of when younger and less experienced and suggestions to write this off as an expensive lesson. I had been going to suggest that Laura heave the ball back into her friend’s court and simply ask him to pay her what he thought she was worth. If he really had no clue, he would give her $25 and she would know he had no clue. And she could keep her mouth shut and save everyone’s pride that way.

But I didn’t, because someone beat me to the punch with a far better answer that I just had to share with the world:

To: “Fashion for the Plus size Woman” [_______ @lyris.quiltropolis.com]
Subject: [fullfashion] Re: Question regarding sewing for a friend

Hi Laura —

This really is the kettle of fish you think it is….

My 2 cents are this…

List materials:

Then list your hours times hourly wage (feel free to not cheat the hours) and put in anything from min. wage to your hourly wage at our real job to the $50.00+ an hour, the custom creation job hours are worth. Then we do a series of discounts: 10% for being a learning example; 25% for not having a deadline; 5% for bringing me coffee etc. until you “price it down” to what you’d like to be paid in labor. (I’m sure in your heart of hearts there is a dollar amount you’d like to be paid for labor.)

This method while sounding silly lets people that don’t ahve a clue (and even some that do) how much a “non-friend” could have/would have charged them. This method has saved me friendships (in my opinion) though I will tell you that I typically go down to something really tiny for labor as I had offered to do it for free, and then many people will kick in more, but again you can’t expect it.

Heather in wisconsin

Much better than pretending to everyone that your time, skills and labour have no (or minimal) worth. It even factors in the value of friendship.

[originally transmitted by e-mail August 12, 2004]

Wednesday, August 11th, 2004

Re: Movie notes [Supertex]

Filed under: jewishness,movies — alison @ 09:17

Alison Cummins wrote determinedly:
>
>So I can confidently say that there is no reason to watch this movie at all.

After trashing Supertex Monday I left for work and continued mulling. It was still bothering me. But then I figured out what the essential technical problem was with the movie the filmmaker wanted to make. The basic question of the movie was “What does it mean to be a Jew when you are living in a place with no Jews?” (Though it was phrased rather differently in the film itself, rather “Q: What is a Jew without a hat? A: A Jew in a Porsche!”) Phrased my way, the question becomes more interesting. But in the movie it was illustrated by having a Dutch Jew living in a place with no Jews (Amsterdam) who thought of himself as Dutch… repeatedly confronting Jews who think of themselves as Jews. So, like, is Amsterdam a Jewish space or not? If it is, the question disappears. If it isn’t, then the structure of the movie makes no sense.

Phew!

(According to Mark, while there is a small Jewish community in Amsterdam, it is secular. And… there are no bagel shops.)

[originally transmitted by e-mail August 11, 2004]

Wednesday, June 30th, 2004

Fahrenheit 9/11

Filed under: movies,US politics — alison @ 09:19

Last night’s movie pick.

I carefully shield myself from unpleasant things I can’t do anything about, which means I don’t watch the news. So this was the first time I ever saw George W in action.

Mean little bugger, isn’t he?

[originally transmitted by e-mail June 30, 2004]

Thursday, June 3rd, 2004

Re: Weekend activities / Writing style

Filed under: camping and hiking,writing — alison @ 17:07

I have received advice in the past to include more of what I think when I write, rather than just listing events. I have resisted because I think that making my readers try to figure out what I thought the listed events meant gives them something to do.

At least, I thought I was resisting. But apparently I give a one-sided, unbalanced picture, rather than a black-and white one that just needs colouring in.

I got passionate responses to yesterday’s letter interpreting my camping weekend as:
dangerous
a time of horror
terrifying.

One person became very agitated at my account of having been persuaded by a reckless and unethical companion to go on a technical climb far beyond my abilities and then abandoned.

Let me be clear: I was never in any danger, never horrified, never terrified. I was outside in the woods, walking and (except for the summit) dressed for the weather. I was happy. “Strenuous” basically means steep. It wasn’t a “difficult” walk, which would have suggested, say, a narrow path along a cliff edge with a backpack (which I have done, and felt annoyed about, but not this time). There was no technical climbing, no ropes, no gear. I expected to be out of breath and I was. I am fat to begin with and have spent the winter crouched over various computers. Getting separated from Mark was not a problem for me: it was an opportunity to think for myself, which I happen to enjoy. Mark was anxious of course, and I was concerned for him for that reason, but I knew he was basically fine. Mark is always anxious on these trips, anticipating the worst even on the most innocuous stroll on a wide gravel path. (What if one of us sprains an ankle in the rain and the other needs to go for help: are we properly equipped or is this certain death from exposure?) He is not heedless, reckless or inconsiderate. Quite the opposite. If he thought it was safe to leave me to my own devices it’s because it was safe.

Other interpretations:
interesting
marvellous.

Marvellous yes, interesting… no. Not in itself. I wrote you guys because I think you’re interested in me, but this was a very mundane walk in the woods. Nice to do, not so much to read about.

A question:
How were the bugs?
Answer: There weren’t any! It was high and windy and the water was pretty much all trickling downstream. No bugs.

Advice:
Motorola Walkabout.
Response: Yup, a set of walkie-talkies is on our shopping list. Though they can’t be light… We’ll see.

Hugs, all!

[originally transmitted by e-mail June 3, 2004]

Wednesday, June 2nd, 2004

weekend activities

Filed under: camping and hiking — alison @ 08:46

We just got back from climbing Camel’s Hump in Vermont. Mark had identified two walks not too far from Montreal that might reasonably be done in a day and a bit and asked me to choose one. Well, that was simple: the “easy” one of course, it’s the beginning of the season and I at least am very, very out of shape. And then I thought: hm: if it’s easy, then it’s flat. Boggy. Buggy. Beautiful I’m sure, but buggy. Perhaps do the easy one in the fall when the birds have had a chance at some of the bugs.

So the “strenuous” one it was. (Total distance: 11.8 km. Hiking time: 6 hours. Vertical rise: 806 m. In American that would be 7.4 miles, 6 hours and 2,645 feet respectively.)

It was a beautiful walk with perfect weather. To reach the trailhead we took a small dirt road and then a very obscure-looking steep gritty road, but there was enough parking lot for 40 – 50 cars, mostly full. While we got ready in the parking lot I put on both layers of my winter coat, the polyester shell and the fleece lining. Someone else in the parking lot wore a tuque.

I warmed up as we walked of course, and eventually took off the shell and unzipped the fleece.

A couple of kms in was the campsite, reached by walking along (meaning in) a stream. (As it turned out, most of the way up and much of the way down involved walking in what appeared to be more-or-less full streambeds.) The site was deserted but thoughtfully set up with eight platforms for tents, a bear hang (for hanging food, not bears) and a moldering privy (poops only: peeing to be done in the woods, pads and tampons to be packed out). Setting up a tent on a wooden platform was a little tricky: the tent didn’t need to be staked to stand up, but it did need to be staked to keep from being blown away by the wind. I wouldn’t say the wind at that spot was fierce exactly, but it was certainly aggressive. We did our best, left our packs there and just took a fanny pack of water and some snacks.

The next kilometer was easy, peaceful and a little rainy, climbing up steadily and pausing at a beaver pond. The rest of the way to the summit though was beautiful, peaceful and slogging. We went down and up a couple of times, looping around for a view before going down to the col between the lower peak we were on and the higher, steeper Camel’s Hump peak we were aiming for. By this time I was walking two steps and stopping to breathe, walking two more steps and stopping. Mark assured me that the walk itself was difficult, that I should walk more slowly, and enquired anxiously about my heart. We encountered a company of friends with their dog who looked at us skeptically and wished us well. Then O joy! A Climb! We were faced with an outcropping of rock. No big deal I thought, we went up, but Mark was very happy to impress upon me that we were on a Level 2 climb, no ordinary hike. (For those not familiar with climbing, Level 2 is a scramble, meaning that you need both hands; Level 5 is, oh, an unprotected climb with no rope and no way to go back, clinging with no more than finger- and toe- tips for 15 meters or more and certain death if you fall. Or something like that.) I think that Mark’s Dutch background has something to do with his level of excitement over a Level 2: he tells me that there’s one stone in Holland, that it’s in a town and the town is named after it. He’d never hopped across a river on stones before hiking with me: waterways in Holland are silt. Or perhaps it’s nostalgia for his climbing days in Switzerland, when he did Level 4 climbs on real mountains, not these old worn-down nubs of hills we have here. Or perhaps it’s just me refusing to acknowledge that anything I do might be considered an accomplishment.

The summit was windy. We had been warned by a lone backpacker on her way down that she had been very nearly blown off. She looked at us and thought that the summit might be safer for us because we didn’t have full packs, and wished us well. It was completely bare except for some spots of bright yellow lichen; the water ran under a cover of ice; and while I had been pausing for breath every two steps on my approach, on the summit I was blown right up by the wind at my back and hardly had to pause at all. I was happy to be there but crabby because of the cold. I didn’t see much of the view because I lay down in a crack in the rock to escape the wind and wished for sun. (Not forthcoming.) We ate some dried apricots. I persuaded Mark to zip on his pant legs, which he did. He found gloves, was tempted to wear them and decided that if his hands were cold mine must be colder and passed them to me. I put them on and promptly headed down the path again. I’d had enough.

Going down was easier. No stopping to breathe, but we needed to go slowly to protect our knees and my ears kept popping with the quick change in altitude. Being out of the wind and back into the trees was a huge relief. It was going to be dark in about two hours and it was going to take us about that to get back to camp. Then Mark paused to pee, I took a wrong turn, and he rushed down the right path toward the campsite to catch up with me. When we each realised we were alone on the path there was some thinking to do.

Mark never questioned that he was on the right path, but he had to wonder whether I would ever figure out I was on the wrong one. Should he go back and look for me? Should he walk slowly and wait for me to catch up? I have no sense of direction at all, no awareness of where North is. But I did have a map and I wasn’t totally stupid. He decided to leave me a little pile of M&Ms to reassure me that we were on the same path, and pushed on.

I didn’t figure out that I was on the wrong path until I got worried about Mark and started heading back to look for him. I dimly recalled that there was an option of heading off on a detour or turning back to camp, checked the map and realised that I was on the detour. All the same when I got back to where I had last seen Mark I diligently checked for body parts, shredded clothing and full and happy bears. Nothing. Next thing to worry about: was he looking for me? I took the map and stuck it on the pine tree bearing the sign to the campsite, and stuck a twig through the map at the campsite to show where I was headed. For good measure I decorated the whole assembly with a dried apricot.

It was actually kind of nice to be heading down the path alone, free of excellent and well-meaning advice. Especially after I found the M&Ms, because then I knew for certain he was on the path ahead of me, and I could worry compassionately about him because I knew he didn’t know where I was. Not for sure.

I passed a man with a dog, who told me Mark was ahead and that he would have supper waiting for me. How sweet!

Half an hour later, a man with two children who told me that Mark was ahead, that he was getting the headlamps from camp and would come back looking for me. Oh dear, I’d better hurry.

Twenty minutes after that, I found Mark sitting dolefully on a rock nursing his knees, realising that he was in too much pain to conduct a night search for me on a mountain and very grateful that he didn’t have to.

Back to camp, slowly this time. We were in bed by eight: it was too cold and windy for sitting outside to be fun, even with a fire.

Morning found us in fine shape, if cold and a bit slow and tender-kneed. It had hailed in the night but our food was dry. Packed up, back to the car. The path down was very soft, easy and gentle compared to what we’d done the day before. We appreciated it. And we met lots of interesting people heading up.

An extremely fit and energetic couple in their sixties rushed by, wearing sleeveless shirts and carrying small water bottles in their hands. Not dressed for the 70 kph winds at the summit, and with water bottles in their hands how would they scramble up the rocks? But whatever, they looked like they were used to doing things outside.

A family of seven, including a toddler being carried on her father’s shoulders and a four-year-old anxious about the mud on her new white shoes.

A group of middle-aged folk, one of whom asked us plaintively if the path kept going up? Yes, we answered, wondering privately how he thought he was going to climb a mountain without going up.

And various more prepared-looking hikers. We wished them all an enjoyable day.

Back to the parking lot, a brief consideration of another day-hike, nixing that in favour of a tour of the Ben and Jerry’s factory and a visit to Wal-Mart to pick up some weewee pads for Pepe.

Home in time for tea.

Bisous!

[originally transmitted by e-mail June 2, 2004]

Sunday, May 2nd, 2004

Not sick, just bad.

Filed under: dogs,illness,psychology — alison @ 20:19

Poupoune is my favourite dog. She is alert, attentive, attached and one of the most fully alive of earth’s creatures I have ever known. She is also irritable, ill-tempered and quarrelsome.

This winter she’s been grumpier than usual. Cranky. Snappish even. Things she’s never enjoyed — like having her paws caught during wrestling matches — get snarls and air-bites now. She’s become totally fed up with Pepe, not tolerating his presence anywhere near her. And she’s bitten us three times, drawing blood once. The first two times we could kind of understand what provoked her. But when she and Mark were napping together as usual this week and she bit his leg when he shifted in bed was just too much. I immediately made an appointment with the vet.

As I explained to the vet yesterday, my hypothesis was that she’s in pain and snapping at whoever happens to be nearby. The vet put forth another hypothesis, that she’s becoming blind and panics when approached by someone or something she can’t see.

Well, both hypotheses were eliminated. Her vision is excellent (no cataracts, pupils respond well to light, and she blinks when you tap your hand towards her eye), her joints are smooth, flexible and non-tender, her innards sound and feel perfectly normal, and when she runs excitedly around the room sniffing and leaping she doesn’t hesitate or favour any side or leg. For good measure, her temperature and bloodwork were also checked and show absolutely no abnormalities.

This is when hypothesis 3 was brought out: not sick, just bad. (Or in vet-speak, “exhibiting inappropriate dominant behaviour.”) The first question the vet asked me when exploring this hypothesis was “Does she exhibit this behaviour in one particular place or situation?” The answer being “Yes, in the bed,” the take-home advice was “Don’t let her in the bed any more.” (Recalls the old joke: “Doctor, my arm hurts when I go like this!” “Well, don’t go like that.”) We were also offered psychoactive medication (for her) to help in the behavioural-modification program.

We’re pretty much going ignore the advice. We certainly don’t need drugs to manage her. We were worried she was ill, and $212 later we know she isn’t. We have our answer. She’s 11 lbs / 5 kg (about the size of a cat but without the sharp claws) and bites us maybe once every one or two months. We don’t have kids. It isn’t a safety concern and we enjoy napping with her. We’ll just be a little stricter: she won’t be allowed in the bed without us. And more severe with consequences when she goes too far, because we won’t be worried about her.

[originally transmitted by e-mail May 2, 2004]

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress