transparency

Tuesday, July 18th, 2006

shame

Filed under: consuming,fallacies,humility,illness,jewishness,reality check — alison @ 08:10

[Anyone reluctant to read about other people’s disgusting oozy things and biological functions is instructed to cease reading immediately and to delete this e-mail and forget they ever saw it.]

Before leaving for Toronto last week I developed a canker sore in my cheek. I don’t get them often – I think the last one was probably fifteen or twenty years ago. After a day in Toronto I was really fed up. I was having trouble swallowing, and the sore was clearly poised over some nerves because I had pain in my ear and teeth and that side of my face was numb and tingly from my lips to my lower eyelid. I made an appointment with a dentist. (Why a dentist? Because you can look them up in the phone book and you don’t have to ask if they are gynecologists or gastroenterologists or pediatricians before making an appointment. Because you can get an appointment. Because even if the problem isn’t my tooth, it’s the kind of thing dentists see a lot. Because when I got a canker sore on a trip to Vancouver in… 1974? my mother took me to a dentist. Because I let my Medicare card expire and getting a new card is taking a lot longer than getting a reimbursement from my employer’s dental plan is going to.)

Anyway. It was a very nice dentist’s office. The receptionist had me fill out a card with contact info and medical history. She led me into an office and sat me in a dentist’s chair, and a young man in scrubs came in and started asking questions. I giggled privately to myself about the phenomenon of professionals becoming so very young as one ages. He didn’t look in my mouth though, and the conversation soon tuned to the upcoming Gay Games / Outgames and Divers/Cité / Pride parties in Montreal, which he will be attending. I started thinking that this was a very peculiar dental appointment, and when was he going to look at my canker sore? And then the dentist walked in…

The nice Jewish dentist looked in my mouth, asked a few questions and immediately called in a colleague for a second opinion. I started feeling like less of an idiot for consulting over a canker sore. The stern Goyish colleague looked in my mouth, asked the same questions and pronounced: “Salt water rinses. If it doesn’t get better in three days, come back and we’ll do x-rays and exploratory surgery. No antibiotics. The body heals itself.” As a stern Goyish type myself, this evaluation sounded right to me and I submitted easily. But as the stern Goy turned on his heels and left, my nice Jew started twittering anxiously over me: my mouth must be very painful. Do I need a prescription for painkillers? Ultimately he wrote me a prescription for penicillin, which I accepted after receiving assurances that yes, canker sores were bacterial infections. I giggled privately over this little drama and the cultural split and the stereotypes, imagining them as a couple with their children, one giving directives for life and the other fussing over feelings and offering palliatives in secret.

I had been given the penicillin prescription with the proviso that I didn’t need to take it, but that it would shorten the course of whatever it was. My stern Goyish self held out for two hours before shamefully caving in and filling the prescription. Sigh. So much for cultural stereotypes. (I mean, I know I flout the WASP taboo against TMI, but I had sincerely thought I was good for the one against unnecessary antibiotics.)

My course of antibiotics ends today, and while my thingy has gotten a little better it’s not a dramatic improvement. Another appointment, this time with my own dentist. Who likewise calls in an immediate second opinion. I get a name this time, “aphthous ulcer.” It’s a combination bacterial-viral thing it seems, so antibiotics only help up to a point. My dentist’s second opinion held forth that Big Pharma won’t develop antibiotics against viruses because then they would lose all that income from cold remedies, and that I will get best results with homeopathic Arnica granules. The sore is infectious now, so for the next two weeks, as it finishes healing, no kissing. My own dentist looks on from the sidelines, fascinated. I firmly decline the homeopathy – somewhat scandalised, in fact – and go home to research “aphthous ulcers” on the internet.

Turns out they’re an autoimmune phenomenon of some kind. Neither bacterial nor viral. Certain antibiotics (not the ones I had been prescribed) do help, but probably by their direct effect on the immune system and not by killing bacteria. They are not infectious.

You know how they say to trust your professional and not the Internet? I’m going with the Internet on this one. I have a funny feeling.

And am feeling even more deeply ashamed for caving on the penicillin. (On the bright side, I can go snog my beloved now.)

[originally transmitted by e-mail July 18, 2006]

Sunday, July 16th, 2006

bemusement

Filed under: random — alison @ 21:46

So, like, I was in Toronto last week on a business trip. Two divisions of the company I work for are aligning their software, a process that will have taken over a year and a half by the time it’s completed, a very aggressive timeline (really, it is, I’m not being ironic), and I am a SME, a Subject Matter Expert. Hence the visit to the head office to attend a week of meetings.

Ok, so here I was, waking up in a downtown hotel, putting on a suit, asking the doorman to get me a cab, asking the taxi driver to write me a receipt so I could put the trip on my expense account, then walking into a tall glass tower with a laptop gripped firmly in one hand.

This is not how I envisioned my future when I was in college. Not that it’s bad or anything. But… bemusement.

[originally transmitted by e-mail July 16, 2006]

Saturday, May 6th, 2006

blogs and man-whores

Filed under: random — alison @ 09:20

Mark attends a monthly social gathering of Montreal bloggers. (For those new to the Internet, a blog is a sort of public diary. You have a website and every so often you write something new, a “post,” and other people can read your new post and all your previous posts and they can also publish comments of their own in the “comment” section.)

Last week I went with him for the first time. I generated much suspicion when I admitted I didn’t have a blog of my own, rather like a banker at a Communist Party meeting, but people kindly agreed to talk to me anyway. I think it’s something to do with people not being able to know who you are if you haven’t laid it out for them in diary form. They need to be able to know your politics and private obsessions to be able to start a conversation with you. Rather like the usual social awkwardness of not knowing the gender of a person you are communicating with, or the need in some places to know someone’s social position. Among geeks and nerds, you need to read someone’s blog before being able to take things any further.

This idea that you need to know someone before communicating with them – rather than using conversation or shared activities as fun and useful ways of getting to know them – was borne out by a conversation I had with a young man who was a great fan of the Meyers-Briggs personality inventory. (For those new to the Internet, this is a psychological test that assigns you ratings along four scales, including introverted/extroverted and intuitive/analytical.) He claimed it was the greatest advance in psychology ever, because if you knew your and other people’s profiles you would know what you and other people were like and what they were good at. I suggested that this could also be accomplished by doing things oneself and by paying attention to other people. He was stymied for a minute and then admitted, “Well, that way wasn’t accessible to me.” Meaning that he was so socially isolated he didn’t know other people well enough to understand what they cared about, and the Meyers-Briggs personality inventory was able to explain to him in a logical way that people were different. So now we have two ways to know people before communicating with them that are deemed extremely useful: the blog and the Meyers-Briggs profile. Without which a certain group of people find social interaction almost unbearable.

Anyway, I met some very nice people there. Mostly men, mostly expatriates, mostly thoughtful. I was having a very interesting conversation with an architect from Chicago (about architecture and about the crossovers between the french and english communities in the Montreal area and how they have changed over time) when a group of young people insisted we join them. Excellent, I thought. I will expand my horizons and converse with Young People. It turned out that they were drunk, but that’s not always a bad thing.

Well, we talked about Meyers-Briggs for a long time, and about whether one posted naked pictures of oneself on one’s blog, and whether gay marriage was going to save the institution of marriage itself. (I didn’t follow that last one except to make a mental note that this topic was *so* Dan Savage ca 2002. Young people are clearly not as hip as they seem.) Two of the young people I initially took to be a gay man and his fag-hag, but it turned out they were a straight couple except that she was bi. One of those annoying kinds of bis who think that being into women means that you have a threesome with your boyfriend. Whatever. Young people these days… just because it’s different doesn’t mean it’s wrong I reminded myself. Keep an open mind.

And then the conversation turned to their friend Kevin, who was a man-whore. This expression puzzled me. Kevin is by default a man, so that doesn’t need to be specified. And a whore’s customers are almost always men, so that doesn’t need to be specified either. So I asked. “What’s a man-whore?” They had a lot of trouble explaining since they didn’t understand my puzzlement. It turns out that a man-whore is a man who has sex (for free) with lots of women. A slut, I would call him. Or a cruiser. Or a player. Or a seducer. “Man-whore” seems to me to be both ambiguous and inaccurate and thus not a useful term. I couldn’t get this point across. Neither could they get across the point that the meaning of “man-whore” was self-evident.

It was at this point that I gave up on the young people and turned back to the grown-ups, who by this time were discussing computer hardware and peripherals. Not much better. We left soon afterwards.

But now I’m thinking, maybe I *should* have a blog. That way my friends and family can post their comments for my family and friends to read, and the social meaning of the word “man-whore’ could be elucidated. (And everyone could say what breed of dog they are and could see that everyone was a Siberian Husky except for one person’s roommate who was a golden retriever.)

For now, however, I’m going to go do some taxes.

Happy spring!

[originally transmitted by e-mail May 5, 2006]

Wednesday, March 29th, 2006

Tuesday night is movie night.

Filed under: random — alison @ 08:49

We saw “Why We Fight.”

After the credits, hot tears. I sat in my seat, a hand pressed into my face, until the guy who comes to clean up the spilled popcorn turned on the lights and came in. He saw me and came to check on me. “Are you ok?” I just saw a very sad movie. “It’s just a movie!” No, that’s the problem, it’s a documentary! (Wan smile.) “Oh, but even documentaries only show partial truths.” It’s okay, I said, and waved him away. Urgently.

I didn’t say, Even partial truths can be something to be sad about. I didn’t say, Loss of idealism is something to be sad about. I didn’t say, You’re too young yet to have lost yours, you’ll understand when you’re older.

Mark took me home and put me to bed. We didn’t say much.

***
I don’t watch television news. I have waged losing wars – rather, burbled ineffectual protests – against the presence of televisions in my home. They have been imposed on me by everyone who has lived with me except for my very first roommate, a master’s student from Tanzania, who I believe kept a little set in his bedroom. But at the very least I can refuse to watch the news.

I can handle CBC radio news. The headlines and brief explanatory paragraphs of the hourly updates don’t have the time to reach into my soul. The longer discussions of the evening and afternoon shows, no matter how horrifying, at least reassure me that thoughtful people care about these issues and are analysing them complexly. Presumably something is also being done, to the extent possible.

I didn’t see the Twin Towers burning and falling, over and over again, the way it seems everyone else did. (Except for Betsy, who was busy giving birth (to twins) that day.) On September 11 I heard the news, saw bits of streaming video on colleague’s computers and called my mother, shakily, and talked imaginatively for an hour about American foreign policy. That was enough. I didn’t need to sit transfixed in front of a screen while images of falling bodies burned themselves into my brain all day.

Back in November or December 1985 when I was living with my considerate Tanzanian roommate I stopped in to visit a friend when the evening news was on. The topic of the day was the famine in Ethiopia. Turn that thing off! I shrieked. My friend was perplexed. “It’s the news, aren’t you interested in the news?” Why on earth would I be interested in bringing a child into my home to starve to death in front of me while I did nothing, didn’t lift a finger to help? No. I’m not interested.

I’ve watched the local news on television a couple of times since 1985, but I always walk out before they get to the international news. It’s always bad, and I’m always helpless.

[originally transmitted by e-mail March 29, 2006]

Saturday, January 14th, 2006

Quiet weekend

Filed under: random — alison @ 15:54

Mark is off on a weekend-long workshop on wilderness safety. This is right up his alley – possibly a little too much so. I have visions of being required to carry an avalanche pack next time we go for a stroll on Mont-Royal.

But for today I am enjoying wearing a PEASANT BLOUSE and COMFORTABLE UNDERWEAR.

Hugs to all, and a happy new year!

[originally transmitted by e-mail January 14, 2006]

Tuesday, December 27th, 2005

A weblog I’ve been following with the adulation of a star-struck teenager

Filed under: Aspies,business,mental illness,parenting — alison @ 20:16

Kathleen’s site is a resource for designer-entrepreneurs in the “sewn product” field. She’s passionate, extremely bright and rides her hobby-horses (pattern cutting and lean organisation) with the single-mindedness that is the gift of Asperger’s syndrome. She wrote the book that you can buy through the site – and that is used as an essential text in fashion schools all over North America.

This particular entry documents the application of a business management approach to a potential domestic crisis.

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress